Blackwash: (noun) an attack intended to ruin someone’s reputation; synonyms: assassination, character assassination type of: calumniation, calumny, defamation, hatchet job, obloquy, traducement; a false accusation of an offense or a malicious misrepresentation of someone’s words or actions.
As you can see, blackwash and character assassination are interchangeable terms. It is something that goes on, and has gone on, for a very long time. It is usually an effective way to silence someone from telling the truth, as well as serving to discredit them in the minds of anyone who believes the blackwashing propaganda: it is a form of brainwashing.
Character assassination can be used against anyone with a high public profile, including celebrities, athletes, scientists, and politicians. It’s often a reaction to feeling threatened by the target. (See source of definition, here.)
Examples of Character Assassination:
- Spreading rumors
- Negative campaigning
- Anonymous online defamation
- Hurtful comments
- Undermining others’ efforts
- Repeated demeaning statements
- Slanderous accusations
Specific examples: portraying someone as a racist, a Nazi, a drug user, a criminal – with the last two, they may even be framed for committing crimes that they did not commit, so that the mud sticks, so to speak. What people need to understand about the mainstream media is that it is mostly fake – what I like to refer to as Opposite World, or Upside-Down World. If someone/thing is portrayed as good, they/it is usually evil: if someone/thing is portrayed as evil, it is good. This is not always the case as true things are reported in the media, but even what is true will be spun in some way to serve some agenda.
Fake Blackwashing: Controlled Opposition
I wrote about controlled opposition in this article, relating it specifically to censorship. In relation to blackwashing, I can give you even more information based on my background in law.
When someone pleads ‘not guilty’ to a crime, it goes to trial. If the trial is televised, it is fake. The most you will see of a real trial as it is happening, is courtroom sketches (see examples here). The sketches can be faked, too, especially in high profile cases manufactured to push some agenda. If you are not there to see it yourself, you can never really be sure.
When someone goes to prison, they should not be treated like a celebrity being interviewed from prison, or some other place of detention, including house arrest. This only happens when the whole thing is elaborate theatre designed to have people believe what the controllers want them to believe. My focus at university was criminal law – I do not recall one case where run-of-the-mill criminals were being interviewed by the mainstream media.
The best example I can give you of a fake crime, trial, ongoing interviews, etc., is the Charles Manson psyop which began in 1969. That whole thing was about blackwashing the Peace/Anti-War Movement that sprung up in the 1960s. People were starting to wake up and fight back during that decade – they needed to put an end to it by associating Manson and his flying monkeys, with this movement (i.e. ‘hippies’). (Please read this article for evidence.) So, blackwashing is not only used against individuals but political movements, causes, etc.
In 1970, the (psyop) New Age Movement was foisted upon the masses – it was designed to put everyone back to sleep. I have been deconstructing this crap for about a decade now.
A more recent example of high profile, false blackwashing, would be the fake smear campaign (and assassination attempts) against someone who managed to win in the end. Understand that if they really wanted him gone, you would never hear anything from him again. That’s the way real character assassination works. If these people are such a threat to those in control, they would not have a social media presence, be able to get their books published, or influence global policy. They would have ZERO sway over the masses. (Maybe you should take a closer look into his background so that you know the whole truth and nothing but the truth about him.)
Artificial Intelligence (AI): Can You Trust What You See And Hear?
I wrote about how technology can be used against us in this article. This technology can be used to make all kinds of things appear (or sound) real when they are not, including framing someone for a crime they did not commit. However, I have seen it being used more recently in portraying cataclysmic events in places where nothing is happening (I am not referring to the California fires here). All they have to do is use reconstructed old footage of fires, floods etc., and claim that it is currently happening. But unless you are there to witness it, or you have people that you trust in those specific areas who will tell you the truth, take it with a grain of salt. (Fires may also be deliberately lit in order to push people out of locations that those in control want to take for themselves. If the homes of the rich are destroyed, they will take their juicy insurance payouts and rebuild, or move to some other prime location. They usually own more than one residence, so they won’t end up on the street.)
Many years ago, one of my university lecturers suggested that we should not believe the news. He saw some report of a fire happening in the area where his ex-wife lived. He called her to see if she was OK. She told him that there was nothing happening there. Later he saw another news report stating the same thing. He called her again and she told him the exact same thing.
I have also discovered the truth in similar situations via my own experience, or from those I trust who are at a particular location, that nothing has happened as it is reported on the news. It may not be related to a natural disaster – for example, when we were told during the lockdowns that hospitals were overflowing with sick people when they were, in fact, empty.
This is not to say that there won’t be real cataclysms happening in the years to come. However, the controllers will use this against us. If there is land that they want to take for themselves they will declare those places “emergency zones”. This is to remove residents from those locations and to prevent tourists from going to holiday hotspots.
They will also use real cataclysmic events to push the climate change agenda, especially when it comes to fires caused via natural means (i.e. lightning bolts). It will be used to advance the totalitarian control of humanity.
Think critically and do your own research.
Helen
