Aries Peter
Taurus Simon
Gemini James
Cancer Andrew
Leo John
Virgo Philip
Libra Bartholomew, or Nathaniel
Scorpio Thomas
Sagittarius James The Great
Capricorn Matthew
Aquarius Jude Thaddeus
Pisces Judas Iscariot
Each of the Apostles in the Bible represent the different zodiac signs – their characters are supposed to take on the core characteristics of each sign. (For more on this please read the following article.)
My interest is more in the Astrological Ages – which move ‘backwards’ in time – and how we are now exiting the Age of Pisces which has been a profoundly deceptive period for the majority of people throughout the world. Interestingly enough, Judas Iscariot – the one who betrayed Jesus – represents the sign of Pisces. The darker side of this zodiac sign is deception, betrayal, illusion – including self-delusion. In my opinion, the Age of Aquarius has already begun, primarily because Saturn – the Real Ruler of this sign – entered Aquarius in late March 2020. (For more on this New Age and what it really entails, please read the following article.) I would describe this entrance metaphorically as the birth of a child – her/his head has already popped out and there’s no pushing her/him back into the womb at this stage… We have reached the point of no return.
Helen
Where is the evidence of this? Is there historic evidence that you can cite please, of the births of the 12 apostles?
My interpretation of the Bible is not a historical, or literal one. The entire Bible is occulted – based on astrological and numerological knowledge. This knowledge of the Bible is hidden from most people.
If you are interested in a deeper analysis of the occulted nature of the Bible, I recommend the following articles on my website: “Judgment Day & The Aquarian Age” and “In The Beginning Was The Word”.
If you believe the Bible is a historical, or literal document, then my work is not for you.
The same correspondence exists with the 12 sons of Jacob. For proof check out The Twelve Constellations in the Tribes by Theo B. Wilson… the book just came out. It shows the correlations and their meanings… interesting read. Not quite finished reading yet.
The astrological references are there, for sure. The Greeks wrote the Bible, so the Apostles were the first reference to the zodiac signs.
If you would like to know more about the true origin of the Bible, I recommend my article, “In The Beginning Was The Word”, specifically the last section about the Masonic/Greek origin of the Bible.
It’s not necessarily when they were born, in fact it’s likely they were never born at all just representations of the major zodiac signs surrounding jesus, the son, or more correctly the sun x
That’s my interpretation, too.
I am interested in what you stated about the age of Aquarius beginning in March 2020. It seems 9 months later a bright star in the sky will shine! Dec. 21st.
You are referring to the Saturn/Jupiter conjunction in Aquarius on that date. It’s also right before Christmas which is the time when the Sun is reborn in the Northern Hemisphere. So, it will probably be the time when the metaphorical baby exits the womb.
I would think Peter would be Taurus.
Being the foundation and ‘Rock’.
Thomas, Virgo “doubting”.
Yes, John Leo.
The foundation would be the first sign in the astrological year – Aries. Are you inferring that Virgos are doubters, hence the association to the “doubting Thomas” saying? I suppose they do need proof. So do Scorpios – that has been my experience of them.
I’m generally interested in your take on this and I’ve been doing quite a bit of research into this subject. But, how would you respond the the claim, “the Jewish calendar (i.e. biblical calendar) ended in the month of Adar (i.e. pisces), so rather than us being in the middle of the procession/25,000 years with Aquarius being the next sign, the biblical claim is that the final age is not to be had in this world (i.e. the great mystery that was revealed is that Christ’s kingdom is not of this world).” I’m not sure exactly of the ordering (though a simple wiki read will show the differences between modern and biblical ordering) and I’m not sure of the direction of the sun’s traveling through the signs either, but, at least, biblically it looks like the claim is that the secret wisdom in the stars leads and ends at the time of Jesus (i.e. the last sign (pisces/Adar)). Anyway, hope to get a response, pretty new to this (email would be best – blackledgem97@gmail.com). Thanks for your study.
I do not take the Bible as a Jewish document. The true Jewish Holy Book is the Talmud and I have been told by those who have studied it that astrology is incompatible with Judaism.
I have outlined in other articles the evidence that demonstrates the Bible (Christianity) is Greek in origin. If you want to know more, please read the articles under the blog category “The Real Bible.”
There is no final age, as the ages keep going around and around. Jesus is not a real person but a symbolic representation of the Sun. The Sun passes through all of the zodiac signs on a yearly basis as it does with the ages over longer periods of time. We have already moved out of the Age of Pisces and are currently in the Age of Aquarius.
I don’t think you can just not take it as a Jewish document. The Old Testament is written in Hebrew. And I think those people are wrong, I’ve actually found it more in the Old testament than the new. But, as to my main question, thanks for the response. Still doing my own research on the subject.
According to my research, I can take it as not a Jewish document. It was translated from the Greek – the astrological, numerological and gematria references occulted in the Bible were placed there by the Greeks because they were using these things centuries before the Jews. What they did later on was add in the Jewish laws and customs as outlined in the Talmud – circumcision, dietary restrictions, incest. I have come across several sources from Rabbis that state that astrology is not recognised by them.
You would need to accept the fact that we have been lied to since birth about many things in order to begin to even grasp the fact that the Bible is not Jewish in origin. In my article, “In The Beginning Was The Word”, the very last section entitled “The Masonic/Greek Origin Of The Bible And How It Relates To Gematria”, is where I outline the evidence of the Bible’s Greek origin. I have hyperlinked two books there that provide evidence and then there’s more in their bibliographies, too – especially the first book. I was shocked to discover what I did discover when I started my biblical studies a few years ago.